Skip to Content
Domina Law Group pc llo Domina Law Group pc llo
Call Us Today! 888-387-4134
TransCanada Keystone XL Pipeline

TransCanada Keystone XL Pipeline Opposition Work

Update 6/9/2021 -

Keystone XL Pipeline Terminated, Lawsuits Continue - Read more here or watch below.

For nearly a decade, Domina Law Group has been working with landowners and concerned groups in investigating legal issues and challenging TransCanada Corp.’s assertion that it can exert powers of eminent domain to take U.S. citizens' land for its proposed tar sands sludge pipeline. Nebraska has been and continues to be the battleground for this international issue.


We have carefully researched the legal issues and interplay of federal, state, and local laws regarding whether or not a foreign company whose project will not benefit American citizens can condemn lands in furtherance of its profits, as well as the relationship between federal and state authority over safety and siting regulations.

TransCanada may try to take your land soon. They may ask you for permission to survey your land or they may try to get you to sign an Easement where you sign all your rights away for a one-time nominal payment. Contact us if you want to know more about these issues and how to negotiate for a fair deal and how to protect your land from an oil spill.

Nebraskans must be informed about their rights and landowners and citizens. Call us today at (888) 387-4134 and learn more about what tools are available to you.

There are many issues that must be addressed either through legislative initiative and/or through the courts when evaluating a Pipeline Companies construction project that proposes to traverse multiple states and privately owned land, including:

  • Who controls the siting and routing of oil pipelines?
  • What bonding requirements are there to address effects of construction?
  • What systems are in place for emergency response for spills?
  • How will landowners know there are fair compensations for taking their land?
  • What can landowners do if they do not want to sell to TransCanada?
  • How do value the financial impact of an oil pipeline running under your land?
  • Who ultimately bears the liability for spills after TransCanada is back in Alberta?
  • What is the reclamation and removal plan?
  • How can TransCanada guarantee no spills when removing the pipeline?
  • Do I need a pipeline lawyer who understands pipeline law to protect my rights?
  • How much money is the pipeline company offering landowners?
  • What are oil pipeline companies paying per linear foot?

Watch Brian Jorde and Nebraska landowners on MSNBC's "The Ed Show"

Some of Domina Law's Work Below:

Nebraskans File Lawsuit Challenging Constitutionality of LB 1161 Related to Pipelines

Three Nebraska landowners filed suit in two Nebraska courts challenging a new state law governing routes for crude oil pipelines and the use of eminent domain for pipeline routes across the State. The Nebraska Legislature's 2012 law, LB 1161 gives the Governor a role in route selection and authority to allow a pipeline company to take land from Nebraskans for pipeline operations. Domina Law Group pc llo serves as legal counsel for the landowners.

Timeline of Landowners’ Constitutional Challenge of LB 1161

The next steps in the lawsuit:

Oral arguments for the TransCanada’s Keystone XL case about the alternative pipeline will be heard by the Nebraska Supreme Court this November.

“The Nebraska Supreme Court issued two orders,” attorney David Domina said in an interview on WNAX Radio. “First, it said that the argument before the Supreme Court will be held the first week in November, so that moves it back a week. And that was for scheduling reasons for the court and the lawyers involved. The second thing that happened is that the court clarified how much time will be allowed for the oral argument, and how it will be used and apportioned.”

Does a Pipeline Company really need a survey of your land?

David Domina and Brian Jorde also cautioned landowners against allowing any entry on their land by TransCanada representatives. "They say all they want is a little look, and will give you $500 or so for the privilege. Then they ask you to provide your social security number. What do you suppose they can learn about you once they have the pass key to information about you that most people would never dream is public!" Dave Domina said.

Brian Jorde added, "Everyone knows that in 2012 it is not necessary for them to walk your farm to decide on the pipeline route. It has been flown, photographed, viewed from space, and scrutinized with soil maps, topography maps and every other kind of resource. The goal is to break down barriers and get landowners to say yes the first time because after that it is so much easier to manipulate someone."

Pipeline News & Updated Trial News

Lawsuit Filed Against Nebraska Department of Environmental Equality

NE Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Constitutional Challenge

TransCanada Begins to Offer Landowners More Money

First Hearing in KXL Suit Before Judge Stacy

Judge Stacy Agrees to Hear Challenge to KXL Law

Environmental Impact of Keystone XL Pipeline

Anti-Keystone Pipeline Resolution

LB 1161

Keystone 1

State’s Second Attempt to Get Rid of Lawsuit Fails

Keystone Decision Pushed to 2014

Judge Prepares to Hear Arguments

Judge’s Decision September 2013

Pipeline Safety and Risks

TransCanada continues to make bold safety claims about the Keystone XL Pipeline as it did about the original Keystone pipeline, its first ever tar sands pipeline:

“Keystone XL Pipeline will be the safest and most advanced pipeline operation in North America.”

Would it not be common sense that any pipeline built today should by definition be safer than a pipeline built yesterday? Doesn’t basic evolution in technology, materials, and safety devices make such a statement obvious? Hopefully, all construction projections are safer than those of yesteryear, but anything that is constructed ultimately fails sooner or later.

Do you suppose that Exxon told the good people of Mayflower, Arkansas that the pipeline they were building 60 years ago was the safest in North America? Of course there were. What about Enbridge tar sands pipeline in Kalamazoo, Michigan – safest in North America when constructed, correct? Well, those safe pipelines have led to more than $1 billion in cleanup efforts, devastated the environment, and wreaked havoc on thousands of people’s health and lives.

In 2010, TransCanada stated that its original Keystone pipeline would “meet or exceed world-class safety and environmental standards.”

In its first year, that pipeline experienced 12 separate spills in the United States – nearly one every month. One of those spills alone released 21,000 gallons of dirty tar sands oil. Between the U.S. and Canada, the original Keystone pipeline had “over 30 spills” in its first year, according to a report by Cornell University’s Global Labor Institute. Since then, the line was temporarily shut down in 2012, a few weeks ago, and just the other day at the time this is being written.

The Department of Transportation’s Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) previously shut the pipeline down under a Corrective Action Order stating continued operation of the pipeline would be “hazardous to life, property and the environment.” It was the newest pipeline to ever be shut down by PHMSA for being a threat to public safety.

If you have been affected by a pipeline spill, or leak, or accident, call us today at (888) 387-4134 to find out what options are available to you and what compensation is available.

Landowners - Know Your Rights

A new group of landowners has formed to ban together to secure the best easement agreement and terms possible should the pipeline project go through. Click here to learn more about the Nebraska Easement Action Team (NEAT).

TransCanada has been contacting landowners and requesting authorization to enter upon private property and conduct surveys and other tests. You do not need to sign any papers nor do you need to allow them to enter on your land. Further, in the future expect threats in some cases and scare tactics designated to pressure landowners to sign easements when the landowners do not fully understand all of the ramifications both near-term and far. Contact a lawyer if you are being approached with an Easement Agreement and understand your rights. You do not need to sign anything at any time!

You do not have to even talk to TransCanada or respond to any of their inquiries, let alone sign any Easement Agreement. The proposed easement agreements, both temporary and permanent, do not adequately address the real financial and environmental impact that would be caused by the pipeline construction, operation or removal.

If you are a landowner or potentially affected party, you may have legal rights and remedies pursuant to TransCanada’s project. We are telling all of our clients to IGNORE TransCanada's "final" offers. If TransCanada gets approval for the pipeline, and you have not signed an Easement Agreement, ask yourself this question: "Would I be more fairly compensated by a jury made up from among my neighbors, or would TransCanada give me the fairest deal in my individual negotiations with them?" We hope the answer to this is clear to you. Force the best price and terms by holding out and forcing a condemnation proceeding where you actually have a chance.

Do the Figures Tell the Story?
TransCanada and its Early Proposals

  • 1. Early information suggests that TransCanada’s buying spree across Nebraska is only at bargain basement prices.
  • 2. TransCanada needs to cross about 250 miles of this state with its KeystoneXL Pipeline. At 5,280 feet per mile, times 250 miles, the company expects to have 1,320,000 linear feet of pipeline across Nebraska.
  • 3. Recently, the company appears to be offering about $16.00 per linear foot. At this rate to purchase its temporary construction easements, and its permanent pipeline easements, the company would spend $21,120,000.00 to cross the state.
  • 4. Now, $21,120,000.00 is a lot of money. But, in a project slated to cost tens of billions of dollars, can anyone really believe this is the company’s final position to Nebraska landowners?
  • 5. Imagine the amounts spent by TransCanada to:
    • 5.1. Lobby the United States Congress so much that TransCanada got its pipeline into a bill passed by the House of Representatives.
    • 5.2. Lobby the State Department, and the President, for a Presidential Permit.
    • 5.3. Feed the political machine with contributions to officeholders and office seekers just at the federal level to get the company’s way.
    • 5.4. Lobby the Legislature of:
    • 5.4.1. Alberta;
    • 5.4.2. Saskatchewan;
    • 5.4.3. Montana;
    • 5.4.4. North Dakota;
    • 5.4.5. South Dakota;
    • 5.4.6. Nebraska- including a special session;
    • 5.4.7. Kansas
    • 5.4.8. Oklahoma;
    • 5.4.9. Texas;
  • 6. What did it take to persuade the governors in most of the states along the route to want to try to facilitate TransCanada’s construction, instead of protect their own people?
  • 7. What did a special legislative session of the Nebraska Legislature cost TransCanada? What did they have to spend to get the special session redone with a last-minute amendment that appears to have duped the Legislature?
  • 8. It is unimaginable that TransCanada’s investment in real estate interests in the acquisition of easements across Nebraska could command so little money by comparison to the enormous expenditures to the company in other areas of the pipeline project.

Other Tips Include:

  • Do not take phone calls from TransCanada or return them. Silence is the best option at this point. Keep all written correspondence TransCanada sends and keep it organized in chronological order. Have a file and think of it as evidence.
  • Do not be seduced into any oral conversation. Force TransCanada to put any and all requests in writing. Record all oral exchanges with TransCanada representatives and contractors in a note taking system or journal including the time of day of the call and who called.
  • Ignoring TransCanada is the best option. They have no right to come on to your land. If they do, you can call the local authorities and file trespassing charges against them. If they are on your land without your permission, take photographs if possible to document.


Nationally Recognized Trial Lawyers

  • 60 Minutes
  • CNN
  • Forbes
  • The Wall Street Journal
  • The Washington Post
  • Chicago Tribune
  • Rolling Stone Magazine
  • Los Angeles Times
  • The New York Times
    We Win Cases That Shape the Course of History Over $2.5 Billion Won

    Contact Us Today

    All Consultations Are Free
    • Please enter your first name.
    • Please enter your last name.
    • Please enter your phone number.
      This isn't a valid phone number.
    • Please enter your email address.
      This isn't a valid email address.
    • Please make a selection.
    • Please enter a message.
    • By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your request & other information using automated technology. Message frequency varies. Msg & data rates may apply. Text STOP to cancel. Acceptable Use Policy