Who We Are

Our Lawyers

Meet the lawyers who will be working on your case. With more than 60 years of collective trial experience, we have much to offer you, including awards, accolades and nominations that cannot be matched.

Our Lawyers

In The News

Our Lawyers
in the Media

At Domina Law Group we are fortunate to work on fascinating and compelling legal problems and lawsuits that change laws and affect our country – Media across the US and across the borders agree. Read stories and watch videos of our cases and with our lawyers.

Attorney Referrals

Our firm has a reputation as leaders in complex litigation.

Get the best result possible by partnering with us.

Our legal skills have been utilized in some of the most specialized and complicated cases. These cases were often referred to us by other professionals in the field. We honor and respect lawyers and other professionals who choose to refer complex cases to our law firm.

We have paid millions in fees to our co-counsel. Call us.

Learn More

Contact Us

Contact Us Today

Send Your Message

Trial is legal surgery, the narrowest specialty, and it requires unique skills. Our clients want our service and hope they never need it again- like surgery.

Important Raisin Producers Class Action Briefs Filed

Central California raisin producers are sharply divided over the Raisin Marketing Order’s Rules that “take” a substantial part of each year’s crop from producers without payment or the fair market value for the taken crop.

On March 26, a group of Producers, suing the United States for “just compensation” under US Const Amend V, presented their briefs to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C. The briefs informed the Court that the core issue presented in the case is framed by the Raisin Marketing Order.

David Domina, of Domina Law Group pc llo , writing for the Producers, told the Court:

The Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act, enacted in 1937, and the Raisin Marketing Order, enacted in 1949, were adopted to increase prices of farm products and maintain price stability. Now, the statute and regulation are putting raisin producers out of business, and skewing markets against producers. This case challenges the constitutionality of the Raisin Marketing Order, which allows the USDA, and its agent, the Raisin Advisory Committee, to take a portion of the producers’ annual crop, assume absolute ownership and control over what is taken, and pay nothing for it. Thrusting an involuntary, whimsically declared possibility of a small dividend from a Reserve Raisin Pool on dividend terms unguided by law and not measured by fair market value, does not save the Raisin Order from the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause.

Domina described the specific issues as:

1. Under these circumstances, does the Government deprive the Appellant Raisin Producers of sticks in the bundle of raisin ownership rights, and does it do so without just compensation contrary to US Const Amend V?

2. Are Appellants entitled to proceed with their case to class certification and then trial because their Complaint states a claim upon which relief can be granted?

The Government’s brief will be due in late April. It will be followed by a reply brief from the Producers. Oral argument will occur late this year, and a decision is expected in early 2008.

The raisin case has been followed closely by a number of California Ag groups in a variety of crop areas, as it is expected that the decision may impact USDA Marketing Orders affecting a number of Ag products across the country.

March, 2007

Domina Law Group pc llo is a firm of trial lawyers. We specialize in complex litigation on a national basis. Our lawyers are ethical, aggressive, and committed to providing spirit and vitality to the judicial system and our client’s legal rights.

Categories: Agricultural Law

How Can We Help You?

Tell us about your case.

Send Your Message