Who We Are

Our Lawyers

Meet the lawyers who will be working on your case. With more than 60 years of collective trial experience, we have much to offer you, including awards, accolades and nominations that cannot be matched.

Our Lawyers

Case Results

Mondelli v. Kendel Homes Corp.

With regard to the Mondellis' appeal, we conclude that the district court abused its discretion in excluding the testimony of Drs. Pour and King. This exclusion of evidence was prejudicial error. The district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow joinder of the claims of the Mondelli family.

In The News

Our Lawyers
in the Media

At Domina Law Group we are fortunate to work on fascinating and compelling legal problems and lawsuits that change laws and affect our country – Media across the US and across the borders agree. Read stories and watch videos of our cases and with our lawyers.

Attorney Referrals

Our firm has a reputation as leaders in complex litigation.

Get the best result possible by partnering with us.

Our legal skills have been utilized in some of the most specialized and complicated cases. These cases were often referred to us by other professionals in the field. We honor and respect lawyers and other professionals who choose to refer complex cases to our law firm.

We have paid millions in fees to our co-counsel. Call us.

Learn More

Contact Us

Contact Us Today

Send Your Message

Trial is legal surgery, the narrowest specialty, and it requires unique skills. Our clients want our service and hope they never need it again- like surgery.

Proving Anti-Competitive Conduct in the U.S. Courtroom

David A. Domina presents the plaintiff's argument in Pickett v. Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. In this case, Domina Law Group was able to argue a $1.26 billion jury verdict after six years of pretrial effort. This was one of the largest class actions of its kind. Mr. Domina begins his plaintiff argument by defining "competition" and what it means in both the legal and economic realm.

He states that "Lawyers try to understand an opponent's perspective, but do so for the purpose of attacking it and undermining it, not articulating it with objectivity."

This sort of legal competition is not helpful. Specifically, in Pickett, cattlemen allege that Tyson (America's largest slaughterhouse) used "off the cash market" to reduce market activity and thereby manipulate the price in violation of 7 USC § 192 which is the Packers and Stockyards Act of 1921. To read the plaintiff's argument in full detail, view Proving Anti-Competitive Conduct in the U.S. Courtroom.


No Comments Posted

How Can We Help You?

Tell us about your case.

Send Your Message