Who We Are

Our Lawyers

Meet the lawyers who will be working on your case. With more than 60 years of collective trial experience, we have much to offer you, including awards, accolades and nominations that cannot be matched.

Our Lawyers

Case Results

Mondelli v. Kendel Homes Corp.

With regard to the Mondellis' appeal, we conclude that the district court abused its discretion in excluding the testimony of Drs. Pour and King. This exclusion of evidence was prejudicial error. The district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow joinder of the claims of the Mondelli family.

In The News

Our Lawyers
in the Media

At Domina Law Group we are fortunate to work on fascinating and compelling legal problems and lawsuits that change laws and affect our country – Media across the US and across the borders agree. Read stories and watch videos of our cases and with our lawyers.

Attorney Referrals

Our firm has a reputation as leaders in complex litigation.

Get the best result possible by partnering with us.

Our legal skills have been utilized in some of the most specialized and complicated cases. These cases were often referred to us by other professionals in the field. We honor and respect lawyers and other professionals who choose to refer complex cases to our law firm.

We have paid millions in fees to our co-counsel. Call us.

Learn More

Contact Us

Contact Us Today

Send Your Message

Trial is legal surgery, the narrowest specialty, and it requires unique skills. Our clients want our service and hope they never need it again- like surgery.

Domina Law Group pc llo Reacts to EPA Proposed 2014 Renewal Fuels Standards

The United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") will make a serious mistake if it stands by proposed rules offered for public comment that would reduce, by 30% or more, the amount of ethanol fuel blended with gasoline and diesel in the United States.

A February 15, 2013, press release announced that the EPA seeks public comment for a 60-day period. Comment is invited on proposals setting the 2014 standards for renewable fuel blends. The program includes a number of production and consumption of ranges for key biofuel categories covered by the federal government's renewable fuels standards ("RFs"). It proposes a level of ethanol consumption for 2014 within a range of 15.21 billion gallons.

While nearly all gasoline sold in the United States is now "E10," i.e. fuel with up to 10% ethanol, the new standards would reduce this blend to approximately 7%. The EPA contends the United States is at an "E10 blend wall," i.e. the point at which the E10 fuel pool is saturated with ethanol. Its comment invitation notes that "if gasoline demand continues to decline as currently forecast, continuing growth in the use of ethanol will require a greater use of higher blends such as E15 and E85."

What's Wrong With That?

DOMINALAW Group pc llo wonders why the EPA would be hesitant to emphasis, or encourage, use of higher ethanol blends. Consumption of more E15 and more E85 will further reduce energy dependence on foreign oil. It will conserve and reduce emphasis on fossil fuels. The E15 and E85 blends are environmental friendly when compared with fossil fuels, and it will encourage the development and growth of retail pumping facilities through gasoline pumps that can deploy a range of ethanol blends, thereby making them available to the public.

A Mistaken View

The EPA's action is a blow to farmers and environmental groups. The RFs program was developed by the federal government in an effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and expand renewable fuels while reducing reliance on foreign oil. The standards are supposed to determine how much renewable fuel a refiner or importer is responsible for; they are designed to achieve national volumes for each type of renewable fuel.

America's advancement toward independence on foreign oil and fossil fuels cannot advance if we retard our progress toward use of renewable fuels.

An Untimely Event

The Renewable Fuels Program ethanol and other biofuels have slowly established themselves with consumers. The public is prepared for more of these fuels. The EPA decision to lower the blend volumes and amounts of biofuel to be blended in the fuel supply is contrary to farm interests and consumer interests alike. Farmers need additional markets for their product. Consumers need renewable fuels.

What had been a multi-stakeholder win in the area of renewable fuels and renewable fuels standards threatens to become a significant loss on all fronts if the EPA standards stand.

What Should EPA Do?

The EPA should encourage use of more renewable fuels. Its approach should be to encourage more and more fuel grown from renewable crops on American farms.

DOMINALAW Group encourages farmers to give serious consideration to, and support, the National Farmers Union's unanimously adopted a September 7, 2013, Resolution affirming its view of the obligation of Congress to provide certainty to the nation's family farmers, ranchers and consumers by passing a 5-year farm bill, including renewable fuel standards.

We believe the federal government and its agencies can do only by pursuing policies that support energy security and use renewable fuel standards to help wean the nation off foreign oil, promote rural economic development, and reduce greenhouse gases.

Note: the National Farmers Union Resolution may be read at:


Categories: Environmental Law

How Can We Help You?

Tell us about your case.

Send Your Message