Who We Are

Our Lawyers

Meet the lawyers who will be working on your case. With more than 60 years of collective trial experience, we have much to offer you, including awards, accolades and nominations that cannot be matched.

Our Lawyers

Case Results

Mondelli v. Kendel Homes Corp.

With regard to the Mondellis' appeal, we conclude that the district court abused its discretion in excluding the testimony of Drs. Pour and King. This exclusion of evidence was prejudicial error. The district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow joinder of the claims of the Mondelli family.

In The News

Our Lawyers
in the Media

At Domina Law Group we are fortunate to work on fascinating and compelling legal problems and lawsuits that change laws and affect our country – Media across the US and across the borders agree. Read stories and watch videos of our cases and with our lawyers.

Attorney Referrals

Our firm has a reputation as leaders in complex litigation.

Get the best result possible by partnering with us.

Our legal skills have been utilized in some of the most specialized and complicated cases. These cases were often referred to us by other professionals in the field. We honor and respect lawyers and other professionals who choose to refer complex cases to our law firm.

We have paid millions in fees to our co-counsel. Call us.

Learn More

Contact Us

Contact Us Today

Send Your Message

Trial is legal surgery, the narrowest specialty, and it requires unique skills. Our clients want our service and hope they never need it again- like surgery.

Denial of Keystone XL Pipeline Preferred Route Could Open the Door for New Round of Appeals

Landowners secured a victory last week when the Nebraska Public Service Commission (PSC) denied TransCanada’s preferred pipeline route, but the fight to completely shut down its construction continues.

The 3-2 decision to approve the alternative route is being touted as a win for the energy company as well, but could open the door for a number of new legal options for landowners to challenge its construction.

“There’s a legal argument that TransCanada may have to re-apply (for the public service commission for approvals),” Domina Law Group attorney Brian Jorde said.

Jorde said that the PSC is required to either approve or deny a proposed route, not consider an alternate option. This ruling created a legal question that lawyers are still working to understand, and will likely lead to a continuation of the already nearly decade-long legal battle.

"The landowners haven't lost until the pipeline is under construction, and we're years from that happening, if ever,” said Jorde. "The landowners that would be on [the alternative] route are learning of it for the first time today, and they did not have a voice at the Public Service Commission hearings where they could make their issues and concerns heard.”

Jorde states that these landowners have clear grounds for appeal of this route, as noted by Nebraska Commissioner Crystal Rhoades in her dissenting opinion.

TransCanada itself acknowledged the environmental dangers of this new route during the hearings.

"This additional length would cause greater environmental impact and render the route inferior to the preferred route."

TransCanada now needs to seek easements from a new set of landowners living along the new route while simultaneously cleaning up the more than 200,000 gallon spill from their existing pipeline in South Dakota.

Both the landowners and TransCanada can appeal the PSC’s decision up to 30 days after it was issued, so this ruling may face additional scrutiny. No matter what happens, the landowners fighting this pipeline remain committed to fighting back against this multi-billion dollar company and protect their land.

Related Posts:

How Can We Help You?

Tell us about your case.

Send Your Message