Who We Are

Our Lawyers

Meet the lawyers who will be working on your case. With more than 50 years of collective experience, we have much to offer you, including awards, accolades and nominations that cannot be matched.

Our Lawyers

Case Results

Mondelli v. Kendel Homes Corp.

With regard to the Mondellis' appeal, we conclude that the district court abused its discretion in excluding the testimony of Drs. Pour and King. This exclusion of evidence was prejudicial error. The district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow joinder of the claims of the Mondelli family.

In The News

Our Lawyers
in the Media

At Domina Law Group we are fortunate to work on fascinating and compelling legal problems and lawsuits that change laws and affect our country – Media across the US and across the borders agree. Read stories and watch videos of our cases and with our lawyers.

Attorney Referrals

Our firm has a reputation as leaders in complex litigation.

Get the best result possible by partnering with us.

Our legal skills have been utilized in some of the most specialized and complicated cases. These cases were often referred to us by other professionals in the field. We honor and respect lawyers and other professionals who choose to refer complex cases to our law firm.

We have paid millions in fees to our co-counsel. Call us.

Contact Us

Contact Us Today

Send Your Message

Trial is legal surgery, the narrowest specialty, and it requires unique skills. Our clients want our service and hope they never need it again- like surgery.

Landowners Rally to Prevent TransCanada Lawsuit from Flatlining

Dave Domina at Holt County District CourtThe courtroom was packed – standing room only. The occasion? An hour-long oral argument over LB 1161, the law that allowed Governor Dave Heineman to bypass the Public Service Commission and approve the route of TransCanada’s Keystone XL pipeline.

Since TransCanada recently decided to apply for a route permit with the Nebraska Public Service Commission, they contend that the lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the 2012 law is a moot point. Nebraskans beg to differ.

Attorney Dave Domina who is representing the landowners believes that TransCanada’s attempt to dismiss the suit could be a ploy to keep their options open, in case the Public Service Commission denies their application. Theoretically, if Judge Mark Kozisek dismisses the landowners’ lawsuit, TransCanada could potentially file another application with the new governor, Pete Ricketts, who vehemently supports the project.

“There is no mootness here,” said Domina. “This issue could not be more alive and well.”

Kozisek heard the oral arguments on Monday, but has not yet issued a ruling. The case will go to trial sometime in December, unless Kozisek decides to side with TransCanada before then, which would mean dismissing the lawsuit.

TransCanada still has another large hoop to jump through, even if the lawsuit is dismissed. That is, the pipeline still needs presidential approval since it crosses an international boundary. TransCanada filed the permit application for the project more than seven years ago, and the White House has given no indication as to when the public can expect a decision.

Monday’s Holt County Court hearing wasn’t Nebraska landowners’ first attempt to challenge the constitutionality of the 2012 law that allowed Governor Dave Heineman to approve Keystone XL’s route. The landowners, represented by attorneys at Domina Law Group, previously filed a suit that made it to the Nebraska Supreme Court, but then stalled.

Nebraska’s Constitution requires five votes in order to strike down a state law as unconstitutional. Four of the justices agreed, but three refused to vote, making a change to the constitution impossible. Landowners countered by filing two new lawsuits in an attempt to stop TransCanada KXL.

Although TransCanada has seemingly switched strategies, canceling the eminent domain claims it had filed against Nebraska landowners, Attorney Dave Domina still maintains that the issue isn’t moot. There is a broader public interest at stake here, and that is, should the governor ever have authority to decide and approve pipeline routes? We think not.

For additional coverage on Monday’s oral argument, visit:

How Can We Help You?

Tell us about your case.

Send Your Message