Who We Are

Our Lawyers

Meet the lawyers who will be working on your case. With more than 60 years of collective trial experience, we have much to offer you, including awards, accolades and nominations that cannot be matched.

Our Lawyers

Case Results

Mondelli v. Kendel Homes Corp.

With regard to the Mondellis' appeal, we conclude that the district court abused its discretion in excluding the testimony of Drs. Pour and King. This exclusion of evidence was prejudicial error. The district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow joinder of the claims of the Mondelli family.

In The News

Our Lawyers
in the Media

At Domina Law Group we are fortunate to work on fascinating and compelling legal problems and lawsuits that change laws and affect our country – Media across the US and across the borders agree. Read stories and watch videos of our cases and with our lawyers.

Attorney Referrals

Our firm has a reputation as leaders in complex litigation.

Get the best result possible by partnering with us.

Our legal skills have been utilized in some of the most specialized and complicated cases. These cases were often referred to us by other professionals in the field. We honor and respect lawyers and other professionals who choose to refer complex cases to our law firm.

We have paid millions in fees to our co-counsel. Call us.

Learn More

Contact Us

Contact Us Today

Send Your Message

Trial is legal surgery, the narrowest specialty, and it requires unique skills. Our clients want our service and hope they never need it again- like surgery.

Domina Represents Irrigators in Second Legal Battle Against State

Republican River NebraskaAttorney David Domina has filed a new lawsuit on behalf of a group of farmers who get their water from the Frenchman Cambridge Irrigation District.

Last Friday, Dave Domina filed a lawsuit on behalf of surface irrigators against the state of Nebraska and the Nebraska Department of Natural Resources. The lawsuit is the second of its kind, and seeks compensation for the water that the state withheld from them.

The lawsuit does not deny the state’s right to take that water, but rather seeks financial compensation for the withheld water.

The water in question was withheld from farmers back in 2013. The state agency closed surface water storage along the Republican River and surrounding tributaries when farmers needed that water the most, a fact the state does not deny. The state made that move in order to remain in compliance with the Republican River Compact of 1943.

The state attempted to get the case dismissed, but that motion was denied by the Furnas County District Court. If you would like more information about this story, read it in the Hastings Tribune.

How Can We Help You?

Tell us about your case.

Send Your Message