Who We Are

Our Lawyers

Meet the lawyers who will be working on your case. With more than 50 years of collective experience, we have much to offer you, including awards, accolades and nominations that cannot be matched.

Our Lawyers

Case Results

Mondelli v. Kendel Homes Corp.

With regard to the Mondellis' appeal, we conclude that the district court abused its discretion in excluding the testimony of Drs. Pour and King. This exclusion of evidence was prejudicial error. The district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow joinder of the claims of the Mondelli family.

In The News

Our Lawyers
in the Media

At Domina Law Group we are fortunate to work on fascinating and compelling legal problems and lawsuits that change laws and affect our country – Media across the US and across the borders agree. Read stories and watch videos of our cases and with our lawyers.

Attorney Referrals

Our firm has a reputation as leaders in complex litigation.

Get the best result possible by partnering with us.

Our legal skills have been utilized in some of the most specialized and complicated cases. These cases were often referred to us by other professionals in the field. We honor and respect lawyers and other professionals who choose to refer complex cases to our law firm.

We have paid millions in fees to our co-counsel. Call us.

Contact Us

Contact Us Today

Send Your Message

Trial is legal surgery, the narrowest specialty, and it requires unique skills. Our clients want our service and hope they never need it again- like surgery.

DLG Represents Farmers in Lawsuit Over Water Usage Rights

Water. Many battles have been fought over differing opinions on how to allocate this finite resource. Irrigation is a huge worry for farmers in Nebraska and throughout the United States, and Domina Law Group is committed to fighting for farmer's rights.

In 2013, the state of Nebraska sent surface water to Kansas in compliance with the Republican River Compact, bypassing state irrigators. In a lawsuit filed by David Domina and Megan Mikolajczyk on behalf of the irrigators, the plaintiffs allege that, while the state did have the right to take the water for a public purpose, the state is required to compensate the farmers for damages.

The Attorney General disagrees. While the Domina Law Group is advocating that the plaintiffs' right to use the water is superior to the state's use of the water, Attorney General Jon Brunig wrote in his motion to dismiss brief that the state's use of the water per obligations set forth in the Republican River Compact is superior. Brunig also wrote that the state should not be required to pay damages to the irrigators because the state's use of the water came through adherence to a binding compact.

Usage Rights vs. Property Rights

Domina Law Group, in the brief written on behalf of plaintiffs, cites the Nebraska Constitution Section 21, Article 1 which states that the state of Nebraska cannot take or damage a Nebraskan's property for public use without compensating them. The question then arises – does this groundwater fall into the category of property?

The state is claiming this is a usage right, not a property right, and therefore non-compensable.

Inverse Condemnation

Domina and Mikolajczyk refer to this as an incident of "inverse condemnation." The state of Nebraska took no initiative to appraise and put a value on the farmers' property rights. Conversely, the state says it has no authority to initiate condemnation proceedings on water, and compensation is only offered to landowners whose property has been condemned.

We will stand up in Furnas County District Court this Wednesday to debate the state on this issue.

Comments

No Comments Posted

How Can We Help You?

Tell us about your case.

Send Your Message