Who We Are

Our Lawyers

Meet the lawyers who will be working on your case. With more than 50 years of collective experience, we have much to offer you, including awards, accolades and nominations that cannot be matched.

Our Lawyers

Case Results

Mondelli v. Kendel Homes Corp.

With regard to the Mondellis' appeal, we conclude that the district court abused its discretion in excluding the testimony of Drs. Pour and King. This exclusion of evidence was prejudicial error. The district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow joinder of the claims of the Mondelli family.

In The News

Our Lawyers
in the Media

At Domina Law Group we are fortunate to work on fascinating and compelling legal problems and lawsuits that change laws and affect our country – Media across the US and across the borders agree. Read stories and watch videos of our cases and with our lawyers.

Attorney Referrals

Our firm has a reputation as leaders in complex litigation.

Get the best result possible by partnering with us.

Our legal skills have been utilized in some of the most specialized and complicated cases. These cases were often referred to us by other professionals in the field. We honor and respect lawyers and other professionals who choose to refer complex cases to our law firm.

We have paid millions in fees to our co-counsel. Call us.

Contact Us

Contact Us Today

Send Your Message

Trial is legal surgery, the narrowest specialty, and it requires unique skills. Our clients want our service and hope they never need it again- like surgery.

Domina Law Group Represents Nebraska Irrigators In Suit Against State

Domina Law Group is representing four Nebraska irrigators in a class action lawsuit against the State of Nebraska and the Department of natural Resources. The plaintiffs allege that in 2013, they suffered damages to their crops because the state denied them water that otherwise would have reached them through FCID canals and ditches.

The suit aims to resolve a conflict over the irrigators' rights to water from the Frenchman Cambridge Irrigation District (FCID) and the state's right to siphon off water to Kansas in compliance with the Republican River Compact. The plaintiffs allege that their right to the water trumps Nebraska's obligation to the Republican River Compact.

The plaintiffs claim that each irrigator was entitled to 18 acre inches of water from the FCID. While the suit does not claim the state lacked authority to divert the water, it does claim that the state of Nebraska should compensate the irrigators for crop losses.

View the complaint here.

Comments

No Comments Posted

How Can We Help You?

Tell us about your case.

Send Your Message