Who We Are

Our Lawyers

Meet the lawyers who will be working on your case. With more than 50 years of collective experience, we have much to offer you, including awards, accolades and nominations that cannot be matched.

Our Lawyers

Case Results

Mondelli v. Kendel Homes Corp.

With regard to the Mondellis' appeal, we conclude that the district court abused its discretion in excluding the testimony of Drs. Pour and King. This exclusion of evidence was prejudicial error. The district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow joinder of the claims of the Mondelli family.

In The News

Our Lawyers
in the Media

At Domina Law Group we are fortunate to work on fascinating and compelling legal problems and lawsuits that change laws and affect our country – Media across the US and across the borders agree. Read stories and watch videos of our cases and with our lawyers.

Attorney Referrals

Our firm has a reputation as leaders in complex litigation.

Get the best result possible by partnering with us.

Our legal skills have been utilized in some of the most specialized and complicated cases. These cases were often referred to us by other professionals in the field. We honor and respect lawyers and other professionals who choose to refer complex cases to our law firm.

We have paid millions in fees to our co-counsel. Call us.

Contact Us

Contact Us Today

Send Your Message

Trial is legal surgery, the narrowest specialty, and it requires unique skills. Our clients want our service and hope they never need it again- like surgery.

Judicial Retention: Removing the Target Starts at Home

Attorney David Domina and Carol Domina discuss the issue of the vanishing jury from the United States judicial system and its connection to the judicial retention problem in this Spring 2013 issue of Voir Dire Magazine. Views of morality and government are formulated in the early stages of childhood, and those opinions can only be changed by conscious decision and then repeatedly acting on that change of opinion in the face of opposition. The authors contend that, in the same way, opinion about the Judiciary is formed by each negative or positive experience they, or someone they know, has with it. When trial is avoided and jury verdicts are tampered with, jurors tend to have unfavorable experiences. An increase in unfavorable experiences means fewer advocates for the judicial system and judges. Truthfully, there is immense value to the Judiciary, in fact, participation is key. Read the article in full: Judicial Retention: Removing the Target Starts at Home.

Comments

No Comments Posted

How Can We Help You?

Tell us about your case.

Send Your Message