Who We Are

Our Lawyers

Meet the lawyers who will be working on your case. With more than 50 years of collective experience, we have much to offer you, including awards, accolades and nominations that cannot be matched.

Our Lawyers

Case Results

Mondelli v. Kendel Homes Corp.

With regard to the Mondellis' appeal, we conclude that the district court abused its discretion in excluding the testimony of Drs. Pour and King. This exclusion of evidence was prejudicial error. The district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow joinder of the claims of the Mondelli family.

In The News

Our Lawyers
in the Media

At Domina Law Group we are fortunate to work on fascinating and compelling legal problems and lawsuits that change laws and affect our country – Media across the US and across the borders agree. Read stories and watch videos of our cases and with our lawyers.

Attorney Referrals

Our firm has a reputation as leaders in complex litigation.

Get the best result possible by partnering with us.

Our legal skills have been utilized in some of the most specialized and complicated cases. These cases were often referred to us by other professionals in the field. We honor and respect lawyers and other professionals who choose to refer complex cases to our law firm.

We have paid millions in fees to our co-counsel. Call us.

Contact Us

Contact Us Today

Send Your Message

Trial is legal surgery, the narrowest specialty, and it requires unique skills. Our clients want our service and hope they never need it again- like surgery.

Brian Jorde Discusses Alternate TransCanada Pipeline Route

Brian Jorde, a Nebraska trial attorney from Domina Law Group, was recently featured in an Omaha World Herald article discussing the Keystone XL pipeline alternative route. There is an alternative route, said Jorde, which would add only about 50 miles to the pipeline in order to avoid the Sand Hills region of Nebraska. There is another route that would add approximately 100 miles in the region that crosses South Dakota while taking 50 miles of pipeline away from Nebraska.

A TransCanada rep called Jorde's proposal a mere ploy to stall the project even longer than it's already been stalled. TransCanada also stated that changing the route in this way would require them to obtain a new environmental analysis, a process which could take years to complete and potentially kill the project altogether. In response, Jorde said that since South Dakota has already given TransCanada the right to eminent domain, adding pipeline in that state would probably cause fewer delays than the original plan.

Omaha World Herald report

Journal Star report

Comments

No Comments Posted

How Can We Help You?

Tell us about your case.

Send Your Message