Who We Are

Our Lawyers

Meet the lawyers who will be working on your case. With more than 60 years of collective trial experience, we have much to offer you, including awards, accolades and nominations that cannot be matched.

Our Lawyers

Case Results

Mondelli v. Kendel Homes Corp.

With regard to the Mondellis' appeal, we conclude that the district court abused its discretion in excluding the testimony of Drs. Pour and King. This exclusion of evidence was prejudicial error. The district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow joinder of the claims of the Mondelli family.

In The News

Our Lawyers
in the Media

At Domina Law Group we are fortunate to work on fascinating and compelling legal problems and lawsuits that change laws and affect our country – Media across the US and across the borders agree. Read stories and watch videos of our cases and with our lawyers.

Attorney Referrals

Our firm has a reputation as leaders in complex litigation.

Get the best result possible by partnering with us.

Our legal skills have been utilized in some of the most specialized and complicated cases. These cases were often referred to us by other professionals in the field. We honor and respect lawyers and other professionals who choose to refer complex cases to our law firm.

We have paid millions in fees to our co-counsel. Call us.

Learn More

Contact Us

Contact Us Today

Send Your Message

Trial is legal surgery, the narrowest specialty, and it requires unique skills. Our clients want our service and hope they never need it again- like surgery.

Will Contests: What Happens in a Lawsuit Contesting a Will, Deed, Trust Or Insurance Beneficiary Designation?

Domina Law Group pc llo’s trial services have been used in Will Contest cases and similar law suits, in multiple states. Several were tried to conclusion before juries. Some common features are recurrent in Will Contest cases. They are worth knowing about.

First, Will Contests must be filed by persons with interests in the estate whose rights are affected by the Will to be contested. Before a Will can be contested, someone must offer it to the Court as a valid instrument. This is called offering the Will for probate.

In most states, the act of offering a Will for probate triggers strict deadlines for contestants to meet if their disputes about the validity of Wills are to be presented in Court on a timely basis. One contesting a Will must:

1. Make a timely objection to the Will and ask the Court to declare it invalid and deny it probate.

2. Set forth the reasons why the Will is invalid and prove those reasons.

Wills can be contested on three (3) broad grounds:

1. The formalities of execution required for Wills are not met.

2. The testator, or one making the Will, was not mentally competent to do so or lacked testamentary capacity.

3. The testator, or one making the Will, was the victim of undue influence, i.e., influence so invasive it overcame the testator’s independent judgment.

The Formalities of Execution

Wills must be executed in conformity with strict statutory requirements. Handwritten or “holographic” Wills are inadmissible in some states, and admissible in others, but only after careful scrutiny. Generally, to be formally executed these conditions must be met:

The testator or person making the Will must (a) declare, in the presence of at least two disinterested witnesses, i.e., persons who do no inherit under the Will, that the instrument in question is the testator’s last Will and (b) declare the testator wants to execute the Will freely and voluntarily.

In most states, the testator and two witnesses must sign the document, or acknowledge their signatures on it, in the presence of one another. In many states, this can be done before a notary public who takes the oath of the testator and attesting witnesses. Under oath, these persons recite they are executing the document as a voluntary act.

The formalities of execution are generally met with relative simplicity, though full blown Will Contests can develop over questions about how a Will is signed.

Testamentary or Mental Capacity

Most Will Contest cases raise questions about the capacity, i.e., mental ability of the testator to make a Will. Four general criteria must be present for one to possess appropriate testamentary capacity. Four elements require proof in most states by the greater weight of the evidence to establish testamentary capacity. This means it must be proven that when the Will was executed the Testator had the capacity to:

1. Know the nature of (their acts, the act of making and executing a Will, the nature of their acts in making and executing a Will);

2. Know the nature and extent of their property;

3. Know the proposed disposition of their property; and

4. Know the natural objects of their bounty.

Testamentary capacity is not necessarily the same as medical soundness of mind. People may be rational upon one or more subjects and still not have testamentary capacity. And they may have testamentary capacity even though they (are elderly, are ill, are unable to transact some business affairs, have peculiar habits, are eccentric, are slovenly, are subject to delusions or other mental or physical infirmities, have an impediment of speech, have a weak understanding, et cetera).

Delirium, dementia, limited mental acuity, mental illness, or physical illness so extreme as to diminish mental capacity, are often issues. Many times, medical proof is involved in establishing, or defeating claims of a decedent’s testamentary or mental capacity to make a Will. Sometimes, mental capacity is diminished, but theoretically intact. At times, diminution in testamentary capacity will set the stage for claims that the third ground for contesting a Will – undue influence – is present.

Undue Influence Over the Testator

A valid Will must express the testamentary or death-time dispositive desires of the person making the Will. A Will is invalid if it expresses what someone other than the testator wanted, and achieved by overpowering the testator’s independent decision-making capacity. This is called “undue influence”.

Undue influence is similar to fraud. It is not the same as fraud. One can be unduly influenced by many things. These might include:

1. Deception;

2. False promises;

3. Concealment of true facts;

4. False friendship;

5. Defamation or malignment of others;

6. False affection.

Many states require that undue influence be proven by clear and convincing evidence. Evidence is clear and convincing if it leads a reasonable person with little doubt, and a high degree of confidence, about the appropriate outcome. Others require proof by the greater weight, or preponderance, of evidence.

Undue influence cases sometimes involve medical or psychological testimony. Often they depend on testimony about a deceased testator’s loneliness, dependence, character weaknesses, including excessive approval seeking, or similar features of the decedent’s personality. Frequently, too, undue influence cases include presentation of evidence of bad motives, abundant opportunities, and outcomes which are unnatural looking and the apparent product of, overreaching activity that appears to have duped the testator into a decision contrary to his or her actual desires.

Exemplar Will Contests & Similar Cases

Domina Law Group pc llo’s Will Contest experience involves an array of circumstanvces. Related contests involving the validity of deeds and trusts have commanded the Firm’s attention, too. So have disputed life insurance policy beneficiary designations.

Will Contest cases arise where someone unexpected receives benefits at the time of a decedent’s death that were not expected, foreseen, and are not readily understood or appreciated. Domina Law Group pc llo has helped set aside, or defend, Wills for Clients in cases arising from:

1. Execution of Wills on the testator’s death bed;

2. Wills signed in unusual places;

3. Wills and trusts containing unnatural distributive provisions;

4. Wills or trusts for a second or subsequent spouse where children are omitted, and unnatural, or unusual circumstances due to marriage, including age disparity, interest disparity, etc.;

5. Contests over Wills or trusts believed to be inconsistent with lifetime promises;

6. Wills or trusts drafted by lawyers or others relatively unknown to the testator, and often selected by the unexpected beneficiary or recipient.

The Jury’s Role

Will Contests, particularly those raising testamentary capacity or undue influence issues, are generally tried to a jury. The jury’s role is to decide whether the Will was made by a competent testator, who expressed his or her own desires, or by an incompetent testator, or one whose own will or desires were overcome by inappropriate and undue influence.

Will Contest trial work is not always intuitive at all. It requires considerable skill.

How Can We Help You?

Tell us about your case.

Send Your Message