Who We Are

Our Lawyers

Meet the lawyers who will be working on your case. With more than 50 years of collective experience, we have much to offer you, including awards, accolades and nominations that cannot be matched.

Our Lawyers

Case Results

Mondelli v. Kendel Homes Corp.

With regard to the Mondellis' appeal, we conclude that the district court abused its discretion in excluding the testimony of Drs. Pour and King. This exclusion of evidence was prejudicial error. The district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow joinder of the claims of the Mondelli family.

In The News

Our Lawyers
in the Media

At Domina Law Group we are fortunate to work on fascinating and compelling legal problems and lawsuits that change laws and affect our country – Media across the US and across the borders agree. Read stories and watch videos of our cases and with our lawyers.

Attorney Referrals

Our firm has a reputation as leaders in complex litigation.

Get the best result possible by partnering with us.

Our legal skills have been utilized in some of the most specialized and complicated cases. These cases were often referred to us by other professionals in the field. We honor and respect lawyers and other professionals who choose to refer complex cases to our law firm.

We have paid millions in fees to our co-counsel. Call us.

Contact Us

Contact Us Today

Send Your Message

Trial is legal surgery, the narrowest specialty, and it requires unique skills. Our clients want our service and hope they never need it again- like surgery.

When Small Is Big

Although livestock economists downplay the power that market power has, it can have a life-and-death impact on producers. According to an Oklahoma State University livestock economist, "the small negative impact of captive supplies is 3% of the gross sale price of slaughter cattle. The 3% goes to the packer but should go to the producer. 3% of a $1,000 animal is $30." When you factor in inflation, a relatively small 3 percent in captive supply actually equates to downward losses near 71 percent. As you can see, "small" often has a very large impact. Among other mistakes being made by livestock economists, the SSNIP test does not actually apply to the Packers & Stockyards Act (PSA).

To read the rest of the OCM article by David A. Domina and C. Robert Taylor PhD, visit: When Small Is Big.

Categories: Agricultural Law

How Can We Help You?

Tell us about your case.

Send Your Message