Who We Are

Our Lawyers

Meet the lawyers who will be working on your case. With more than 60 years of collective trial experience, we have much to offer you, including awards, accolades and nominations that cannot be matched.

Our Lawyers

Case Results

Mondelli v. Kendel Homes Corp.

With regard to the Mondellis' appeal, we conclude that the district court abused its discretion in excluding the testimony of Drs. Pour and King. This exclusion of evidence was prejudicial error. The district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow joinder of the claims of the Mondelli family.

In The News

Our Lawyers
in the Media

At Domina Law Group we are fortunate to work on fascinating and compelling legal problems and lawsuits that change laws and affect our country – Media across the US and across the borders agree. Read stories and watch videos of our cases and with our lawyers.

Attorney Referrals

Our firm has a reputation as leaders in complex litigation.

Get the best result possible by partnering with us.

Our legal skills have been utilized in some of the most specialized and complicated cases. These cases were often referred to us by other professionals in the field. We honor and respect lawyers and other professionals who choose to refer complex cases to our law firm.

We have paid millions in fees to our co-counsel. Call us.

Learn More

Contact Us

Contact Us Today

Send Your Message

Trial is legal surgery, the narrowest specialty, and it requires unique skills. Our clients want our service and hope they never need it again- like surgery.

Defamation: Credit Rating Publication

1. Compuware Corps. v. Moody’s Investor Services, Inc., decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on August 23, 2007, decided a matter of first impression involving credit ratings for publicly-held companies. The case (No. 05-1851) found in favor of Moody’s and against Compuware holding:

1.1. Actual malice must be established for Compuware to be entitled to trial on the defamation claim.

1.2. Actually malice was also required to entitle Compuware to a trial on its breach of contract claim.

1.3. Reckless disregard of a statement’s truth is a component of the actual malice standard.

2. Compuware argued Moody’s exhibited actual malice by assigning analysts to study and review the company’s financial condition, who had a conflict of interest. The conflict was unproven, and merely an allegation, so it was insufficient for Compuware to prevail.

3. The Court held that Compuware could not maintain a claim because the credit rating itself was defamatory. “A defamation claim against a media defendant cannot derive from ‘a statement of opinion relating to matters of public concern [that] does not contain a provably false factual connotation.

4. The breach of contract claim presented a particular challenge to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. Generally, malice is not required to establish a contractual breach. Here, the Court concluded the actual malice standard otherwise applicable to defamation claims did apply to the breach of contract claim. No explicit contractual provision was identified as breached, and an implied covenant to perform skillfully and diligently in the credit rating work was rejected as a “backdoor attempt to recover damages for the harm allegedly caused by Moody’s protected expression of its opinion of Compuware’s financial condition.


August, 2007

Domina Law Group pc llo is a firm of trial lawyers. We specialize in complex litigation on a national basis. Our lawyers are ethical, aggressive, and committed to providing spirit and vitality to the judicial system and our client’s legal rights.

Categories: Complex Litigation

How Can We Help You?

Tell us about your case.

Send Your Message